MS attorney: We'd like you to sue IBM on the grounds that Linux is violating your intellectual property in Unix.
SCO attorney: What? That's crazy! We have no proof that they've violated anything, and we can't afford to drag them through the courts for a case we're certain to lose!
MS attorney: We'd like you to sue IBM on the grounds that Linux is violating your intellectual property in Unix, make as much noise about this lawsuit as possible to the people who purchase Linux distributions, and drag out the case and the associated negative publicity about Linux for as long as possible. We are prepared to buy a Unix license from you at a price which will more than adequately compensate your department for these efforts.
SCO attorney: Let me talk to my CEO and get back to you on that....
Updates: some perspective from Tony Stanco and Phil Windley. Redmondologists everywhere believe that these shared files are located and distributed) but I think that might confuse them and said that also contained at least I'll have it done. That's how many lurk? I was bleary in bed by 11:30. Unfortunatley, that 8 hours sleep rule, but my red hat machine keeps crashing (actually, X, not only embeds a knowledge of all the stress we've had, so he can start expanding my continuing education even further.)
So, do YAPC'ers get to play on the main page. In addition, I've hit some work left to evaluate the differences between "free software" and "Starting up. This will make conscious efforts to promote Heretics Meetings that were very dear to me is reliable threads. And if THAT isn't, I need to send about the education system's tendency to travel to Ukraine last.
(Brought to you by jjohn's MarkovBlogger (): If it makes sense, it's not MarkovBlogger ().)