Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

jdporter (36)

Journal of jdporter (36)

Tuesday July 16, 2002
12:53 PM

JPPPP

[ #6393 ]

This is one that is not very common in ordinary usage, but which seems to recur like a bad rash in bureaucratese and militarese.

"to include"

Apparently some technical writers have an aversion to the more usual (and more correct) "including".

Granted, "to include" can be right in certain contexts -- specifically, when describing a future/potential situation, as in some kind of specification. E.g.:

The vessel shall be capable of containing, with zero leakage, a variety of solvents, to include water, ethanol, and benzene.

Problem is, some people conclude that it therefore makes sense in every context. Consider:

Medieval lords employed cruel tactics to keep serfs in subjugation, to include torture, whimsical justice, and extreme taxation.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.