Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

gnat (29)

gnat
  (email not shown publicly)

Journal of gnat (29)

Friday September 20, 2002
11:50 AM

Testing

[ #7867 ]
I'm really impressed with Ovid's testing experiences. I think there's an interesting psychological phenomenon related to testing and exercise and all those Good Things. When I do them, I know they're good. But they just aren't what I find fun, so I don't do them as often as I should. There's a difference between the "feels good when I stop" and the "feels good when I do" that means I get addicted to coding but not to exercise or testing or vegetables.

--Nat

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Ditto on originally not wanting to write tests. The day job still is a situation difficult to unit test, mostly because the code's grown over the past 5 years to such an extent as to be almost unrecognizable.

    However, outside of this, I use Test::Simple lots and am very, very happy with it. It turns the process into just another simple-to-do operation. And it caught a bug in GraphViz::Data:Structure that I still don't know how to fix yet, but at least I know it exists!
  • I have this weird problem that I am addicted to experiencing new things (whether programming related or otherwise), but at the same time I am resistant to change. I was always curious about testing, but I didn't want to change my routine at work, even though I knew it was necessary. Now that I've gotten over the hump, I'm addicted.

    Testing seems like grunt work to many programmers, but what has really sold me is the problem I used to have: whenever I would make large-scale changes to a system, I would h