It's bloody nervewracking, hitting Enter on a commandline that sends 400+ messages. I sent out the "sorry, your talk wasn't selected" messages (our motto--"Perl: Proudly Spamming For Over 10 Years"), and just as it has been the last few years (when I did just the Perl conference notifications) it was scary to run the program on real data with mailing enabled.
I had three proposals rejected too. The OSCon team had a serious overabundance of riches this year and had to turn down a very large number of excellent proposals. No-one should feel the least bit slighted if their talk wasn't accepted.
Why, however, do I get the feeling that this was slightly less than the 100% suffered by a lot of
folk I know?
I know, I know - with 500-odd suggestions and only 100 places, it's a tough choice, and whatever you do, you're going to piss someone off. I kinda feel sorry for the team for having to make such a choice, but that's they're job - instead, I'll be sorry for the friends I know who can't go to TPC any more.
Why, however, do I get the feeling that this was slightly less than the 100% suffered by a lot of folk I know?
I was just making the point that they cut everybody back hard this year. And that there were no favours done: it was strictly on merit and perceived marketability.
No, I didn't suffer the 100% rejection rate that others did. But I did suffer more than an 80% rejection rate. Which is still pretty tough, given my track record.
What's that in real numbers? If I'd had the energy to submit as many proposals as I'd liked, an 80% rejection rate would still have kept me busy for a goodly number of hours.:)
Look at it this way... was your talk good? (Your talk, not your proposal. My proposals sucked.) If so, chances are the talks that were accepted are kick-ass. It's going to be a good OSCON.
the script worked.... (Score:1)
Re:the script worked.... (Score:1)
I did, too. I though for sure that the talk about Bricolage would be accepted. :-(
Re:the script worked.... (Score:1)
Re:the script worked.... (Score:1)
Re:the script worked.... (Score:2)
Why, however, do I get the feeling that this was slightly less than the 100% suffered by a lot of folk I know?
I know, I know - with 500-odd suggestions and only 100 places, it's a tough choice, and whatever you do, you're going to piss someone off. I kinda feel sorry for the team for having to make such a choice, but that's they're job - instead, I'll be sorry for the friends I know who can't go to TPC any more.
Re:the script worked.... (Score:2, Interesting)
I was just making the point that they cut everybody back hard this year. And that there were no favours done: it was strictly on merit and perceived marketability.
No, I didn't suffer the 100% rejection rate that others did. But I did suffer more than an 80% rejection rate. Which is still pretty tough, given my track record.
Re:the script worked.... (Score:2)
What's that in real numbers? If I'd had the
energy to submit as many proposals as I'd liked,
an 80% rejection rate would still have kept me
busy for a goodly number of hours.
Re:the script worked.... (Score:2, Informative)
Four out of five proposals didn't make it.
But yes, I'll still be "kept busy for a goodly number of hours" myself.
Mine showed! (Score:2)
'Tis a good thing (Score:1)
I got all three of mine.
Look at it this way... was your talk good? (Your talk, not your proposal. My proposals sucked.) If so, chances are the talks that were accepted are kick-ass. It's going to be a good OSCON.
Re:'Tis a good thing (Score:1)