That said, we've got a great public school about 5 minutes from us. We're enrolling the kids there, too. We figure we'll start the enrollment now (some of these places have horrendous wait lists) and keep doing research and talking to parents and kids about their experiences at the various schools.
The one thing we don't want is the school our real estate agent had her kids in. The school tried to teach evolution as a "theory, side by side with the theory of Intelligent Design". BullSHIT! No school is wasting my kids' time with that crap.
--Nat
Skorts (Score:1)
--
Esli epei eto cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
Aettot ibrec epesecoth, spakhea scrifeteis.
Re:Skorts (Score:2)
It's 'skirt + short = skort [terrybicycles.com]'. I have a few pair of these and they are really nice for bicycling in and avoiding the completely dorky look of tights.
Evolution (Score:1)
What they really should do is teach evolution as the standard way of envisioning how this all happened, then add "but we aren't entirely sure" and "we don't know what caused it all to happen in the first place." You don't even have to mention
Re:Evolution (Score:2)
That's about the most reasonable way I've ever heard of looking at it. Respect for alternative viewpoints. Cool.
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
gifted and disabled not excusive (Score:1)
My son is doubly identified, both as gifted and as learning disabled. There was testing to confirm the disabled classification a couple of years after he had been classified into the gifted program. The test, while he was in grade 5, rated his reading and understanding capability at a university level, while his writing was at a grade 2 level. (The double identification is somewhat rare,