Slash Boxes
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

drhyde (1683)

  (email not shown publicly)

Journal of drhyde (1683)

Saturday September 08, 2007
02:37 PM

More annoying module authors

[ #34389 ]

So I reported a problem to an author, and even diagnosed it for him cos I'm such a nice guy, saying that "In the pre-requisites you list the 'B' and 'O' modules. But those don't exist seperately on the CPAN, only as part of perl itself, so don't need to be listed. In fact, listing them can confuse some build tools and if the user has a very old version of it might even try to build a new perl for them."

He replied "Well, honestly I think that you need to improve those build tools; or otherwise cite some docs saying that it is illegal to list the modules in PREREQ_PM which are part of perl."

I wonder which part of "a very old version of" - that is, it doesn't apply to the current version - he is too stupid to understand, and why he thinks that other peoples' bugs are my problem.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • But a prerequisite is a prerequisite independently of the fact if they are included in core. I usually encourage people to explicitely list their core module dependencies because there may always be perl installations that miss them. Either somebody used the -Dnoextensions option at Configure time or they have a minidistro or they have a broken installation, there are reasons why they might miss a core prerequisite.
  • It's totally fine to list those modules.

    It is the responsibility of the CPAN client to control dependency fulfillment, it that asks to upgrade Perl, that's generally a fairly obvious failure, and will result in the CPAN client being upgraded by the user in most cases.
    • My experience is that when tries to upgrade perl while a sysadmin is installing some obscure module just so he can write a small script, people say "oh, perl's a buggy piece of shit, I'll use something else". B and O have been in the core since 5.005. If he really does care about 5.004 users, then he's in for Interesting Times, as 5.004's will indeed try to upgrade perl when it finds that dependency.

      In any case, his saying that I need to fix (when it's already been fixed, and pre

  • I've wasted a fair ammount of time debianizing distributions that include some random library that is part of CORE.

    @JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
    print reverse @JAPH;