According to the "BrainBench" (www.brainbench.com), I'm the #1 Perl Programmer in Minnesota. Bwa, ha, ha!!!! Wealth! Power! Women!
Oh, alright. It's a lame-o test that our company wanted us to take. I mean, there were *three* questions that involved "here" documents for crying out loud.
Anyway, my score was 4.71 (out of 5) for anyone who wants to take the "challenge".
For a while brainbench considered me to be the best perl programmer in the UK, which is of course arrant nonsense. I did it for a laugh back when it was free.
Occasionally I'd wind pimps (recruitment conslutants) up by giving them the url...
I dimly remember consulting for Brainbench on some of their tests, possibly including an edition of the one you took.
The whole process is a mess that ideally produces no test that's embarassingly inaccurate, but at the cost of almost never producing a really good test. But I had no particularly better process to suggest, so I refrained from unhelpfully saying "if you write a Perl test to this outline, it probably won't be bad, but it will never be good."
In MN (Score:1)
Re:In MN (Score:1)
Re:In MN (Score:1)
djberg96, you "win" for sure.
Ah... Brainbench (Score:1)
Occasionally I'd wind pimps (recruitment conslutants) up by giving them the url...
Brainbench, oh yes... (Score:1)
Re:Brainbench, oh yes... (Score:1)
Gimme a little credit. Jeeesh!
Re:Brainbench, oh yes... (Score:1)
Sorry mate, I didn't mean any offense. I was poking fun at Brainbench not at you. I gathered from your post that your company paid for it.
Brainbench (Score:1)
The whole process is a mess that ideally produces no test that's embarassingly inaccurate, but at the cost of almost never producing a really good test. But I had no particularly better process to suggest, so I refrained from unhelpfully saying "if you write a Perl test to this outline, it probably won't be bad, but it will never be good."