It seems that "Tels" has hijacked Set::String for the moment. Nope, I never gave it up. I tried emailing the guy, but he won't accept emails without jumping through some gpg hoops. I'm not going to jump through his hoops (especially since I don't have it on my windows box).
Instead I've applied for registration of Set::String, Set::Array, and Set::Hash. I also attempted to re-upload Set::String 0.03, but I'm not sure if it worked.
What do you mean hijacked? When I tell CPAN.pm to install it it tries to install D/DJ/DJBERG/Set-String-0.03.tar.gz and I am doing it off FUNET.
I suspect you are talking about to search.cpan.org which has a long standing problem in that it totally ignores the PAUSE ownership/security information and just displays the latest upload of a given module. CPAN allows multiple uploads of a given module, but the official package list which the CPAN shell uses will only point to one (which must be one of the owners
I'm not sure what your point is exactly. In any case, if the only difference he had was in the algorithm why not submit a patch to an existing module instead of creating a new one?
Hijacked?? (Score:1)
I suspect you are talking about to search.cpan.org which has a long standing problem in that it totally ignores the PAUSE ownership/security information and just displays the latest upload of a given module. CPAN allows multiple uploads of a given module, but the official package list which the CPAN shell uses will only point to one (which must be one of the owners
sky
Re:Hijacked?? (Score:2)
Meanwhile on P5P... (Score:2)
Re:Meanwhile on P5P... (Score:2)
Re:Meanwhile on P5P... (Score:1)