I thought about that, but I have trouble buying it. It seems like a very poor choice:) Besides, it's not really miscellanous, there is some form of coherence there... perhaps though I'm getting that impression from having used unices for only five years.
Just as "no plan ever survives contact with the enemy", no ontology (whether explicit or not) ever survives actual use without sprouting a de facto Etc/Misc classification.
I call that the Burke Hypothesis! File it next to the the Burke Conjecture [cmu.edu]. I.e., with the duct tape and the Shoe Glue, in the junk drawer.
No idea (Score:1)
/etc used to be extremely sparsely populated. About 10 files on a fresh 7th Edition install. Have a look at a pdp11 emulator for more details.
-Dom
Re:No idea (Score:2)
I thought about that, but I have trouble buying it. It seems like a very poor choice :) Besides, it's not really miscellanous, there is some form of coherence there... perhaps though I'm getting that impression from having used unices for only five years.
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
The Burke Hypothesis (Score:2)
I call that the Burke Hypothesis! File it next to the the Burke Conjecture [cmu.edu]. I.e., with the duct tape and the Shoe Glue, in the junk drawer.
Re:The Burke Hypothesis (Score:2)
Exercise left for the reader: why does CPAN not have a Util::*, Misc::*, or Etc::* top-level namespace?
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]