Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

chaoticset (2105)

chaoticset
  (email not shown publicly)
http://chaoticset.perlmonk.org/
AOL IM: chaoticset23 (Add Buddy, Send Message)
Yahoo! ID: illuminatus_foil (Add User, Send Message)

JAPH. (That's right -- I'm not Really Inexperienced any more.)

I'm not just here, I'm here [perlmonks.org], and here [javajunkies.org] too, I ramble randomly in my philosophical blog [blogspot.com] and my other blog [blogspot.com]. Soon I'll come in a convenient six-pack.

Journal of chaoticset (2105)

Sunday May 26, 2002
11:46 PM

Lots Of Options, But No Pretty Ones

[ #5233 ]
Look at me, I managed to finagle a burn of RedHat 7.1 when I need a Linux.

Said Linux will not install (via the handy-dandy installer) on my 486, claiming that it doesn't have sufficient memory, and I'm having trouble partitioning my 60 GB drive on this machine, mostly due to some sort of bad sector.

Note, however, that this is not your typical "minor physical problem" error. This is something seriously wonky, because no version of scandisk that I've been able to run has fixed it; they either hang when it shows up or else act like it's not there. Defrag is having none of this pretending game, though; it knows that the drive's not kosher, and it just ain't having lunch. No defrag, no auto-partition.

Since I can't defrag it, and I can't fix it with scandisk, I'm going to do the next best thing and back everything non-essential up tomorrow and format the hard drive for real. Not this flippin' "system recovery may try to format your drive, whimper, well, maybe we should just fix some files" crap that the recovery CD keeps pushing on me. No way. Tomorrow I'm going to beat this thing like a red-headed stepchild.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • It may be the bios doesn't support hard drives that size. They weren't exactly common in the days of the 486...
    • I was unclear, I apologize. The 486 has a reasonably-sized hard drive for its BIOS, about half a gig. The 60GB drive is on my main machine, this hyah 1 GHz Athlon.
      --

      ------------------------------
      You are what you think.