My problems with trying to learn Lisp come in two flavors so far: The bulky and the nonstandardized. I have a very hard time telling myself that something's worth learning if it's going to be significantly different from interpreter to interpreter, version of Scheme this, Guile that...a certain simplicity in one's basic tools appeals to me.
I realize I should learn Lisp. I guess the real question is -- which Lithp thood I learn?
Emacs Lisp! (Score:2)
ML (Score:1)
For good performance (esp. memory usage), the compiler needs
static typing. For the programmer, static typing
necessitates type inference. Static typing without type
inference leads to the irritating verbosity of C or Java.
I'd love to see a type-inferenced version of C, actually,
for those programs where ocaml is too high-level -- for
example, kernels.
Lithp? (Score:1)
Upon his favorite filly.
"I'm Thor!" he cried.
The horse replied,
"You forgot the thaddle, thilly!"
I'm in town all week. Try the veal.
John