NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
use Perl Log In
chaoticset (2105)
chaoticset
(email not shown publicly)
http://chaoticset.perlmonk.org/
AOL IM: chaoticset23 (Add Buddy, Send Message)
Yahoo! ID: illuminatus_foil (Add User, Send Message)
JAPH. (That's right -- I'm not Really Inexperienced any more.)
I'm not just here, I'm here [perlmonks.org], and here [javajunkies.org] too, I ramble randomly in my philosophical blog [blogspot.com] and my other blog [blogspot.com]. Soon I'll come in a convenient six-pack.
(email not shown publicly)
http://chaoticset.perlmonk.org/
AOL IM: chaoticset23 (Add Buddy, Send Message)
Yahoo! ID: illuminatus_foil (Add User, Send Message)
JAPH. (That's right -- I'm not Really Inexperienced any more.)
I'm not just here, I'm here [perlmonks.org], and here [javajunkies.org] too, I ramble randomly in my philosophical blog [blogspot.com] and my other blog [blogspot.com]. Soon I'll come in a convenient six-pack.
Journal of chaoticset (2105)
Thursday June 12, 2003
08:23 PM
Can You Say Site Update?
Yeah, that's right -- my site has gone from crappy to merely awkward.
It's a start. I need to have something in place that demonstrates some ability to design, even if I don't have a clear notion of what I can do next to create something database-driven. (Which is the next step -- demonstrate that I can write something database-driven.)
Anyway, reviews of the colorscheme/layout/text/etc. are welcome. (And, should I get just a little more ambitious, I'll take petdance's advice on website reviews and run a few tests on it all myself.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
--Larry Wall in stab.c from the perl source code
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Validate it (Score:2)
Maybe a good idea to show that you can conform to the relevant standards. There's a good validator here [w3.org]. As you'll see it has some issues with your site as it stands.