The Gecko isn't just for Windows anymore.
I must have missed the news from ActiveState that ActivePerl now runs on Mac OS X. Actually, it's now on Windows, Linux, Solaris, HP-UX, and AIX too. I guess I should have figured ActivePerl had made it to the Mac when Komodo did, but I never thought to actually use it. Maybe I know about it when it happened, then just forgot.
I've now installed it, and I see that it comes with the Mac::Carbon and Mac::Glue module, along with a lot of other Mac::* stuff. Very cool.
I'll have to wait to play with it. I was just checking some facts for a Komodo article in the next issue of The Perl Review , so I can't get too distracted right now.
And hey, AIX but no FreeBSD?
Actually... (Score:1)
Loaded with Irony too (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Certainly somewhat ironic, but there is also a purely technical reason. To provide forward binary compatible PPM packages, the PPM system is building it's packages using as close to the earliest ActivePerl available on that platform as possible.
That means ActivePerl 813 (5.8.7) for OS X, and ActivePerl 806 (5.8.0) on Win32.
It also explains the better CPAN coverage (5.8.0 vs. 5.8.7)
There's more than 9 ways to do it
Re: (Score:1)
Sacrificing most the usful modules on CPAN to maintain backwards with 5-10 year old legacy version of Perl for what I assume is contractual reasons (correct me if I'm wrong here) is hardly a technical decision, or if it is, it's a bad technical decision.
On ActivePerl Win32 you end up with.
No PPI, or anything that uses it.
No POE, or anything that uses it.
No WWW::Mechanize, or anything that uses it.
No Params::Util (so there goes almost everything I've wr
Little use for FreeBSD (Score:1)
Furthermore, free beer coupon to the first one who can name that revolutionary feature the packager added in FreeBSD and y
Re: (Score:1)
Missed the news? (Score:1)
http://www.mail-archive.com/macosx@perl.org/msg08584.html [mail-archive.com]