If you think a new Crypt::Rijndael might break your application, please test it with 0.06_09. Barring anyone complaining, it's going to be an official release after the holidays.
When I took over Crypt::Rijndael I didn't ealize how many people were using it, and I don't want to break any applications with an unintended upgrade some of you might perform.
I think I've fixed most of the architecture issues, and am waiting for more results from CPAN Testers. I'm especially interested in Solaris reports for this release.
Still getting UINT32 problems on Win32-Strawberry (Score:1)
Re:Still getting UINT32 problems on Win32-Strawber (Score:2)
Although I do want to fix the module for everyone, I'm not going to hold things up for Strawberry Perl since its still experimental. I will try to fix it though.
Re: (Score:1)
Do you feel the patch in this post [perl.org] is too much of a hack?
Re: (Score:1)
There's nothing particularly special about them at all.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm happy to apply patches, but I don't know why MinGW is acting differently from GNU on unix.
Re:Still getting UINT32 problems on Win32-Strawber (Score:1)
I did this and it compiles and tests fine on Strawberry Perl with MinGW and dmake.
I also built and tested with Activestate Perl and VC++ toolkit and that compiled fine and tested okay.