I've been getting a fair number of emails about Crypt::Rijndael, so I guess a lot of people must be using it. I thought it was some little used thing that nobody cared about.
I think I've fixed most of the bugs in RT, but I want to wait for more CPAN Tester reports to ensure the systems that had problems previously now have them fixed. I would certainly appreciate any CPAN testers who can add these data points for Crypt::Rijndael:
Systems that had failures in 0.05 but not passes in 0.06_02 yet:
Systems with bugs in RT:
Strawberry Perl: conflicting types for UINT32 (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I've uploaded 0.06_03, which first checks for previous definitions before trying to do the typedef. I have to assume, however, that the previous definitions are right unless I want to undef them. For the moment, I'll trust the
Re: (Score:1)
0.06_03 still wouldn't build for me. I did some quick hacking to rijndael.h to work around the definitions in a different way and got it to build:
I have no idea if this works elsewhere or screws anything else up, but "w
Re: (Score:2)
I've tried the _MINGW_H trick in 0.06_04, but that seems like the wrong solution, even if it works. That's probably just me, though. I haven't found any programmer's guide to what we should do for this, and the most I found in the Perl sources was in POSIX.xs.
Linux x86-64 blead (use64bitall) passes (Score:1)
Cheers,
Steffen
Crypt::Rijndael (Score:1)
Freebsd 6.0-release (alpha-freebsd) (Score:1)
I am the owner of this box.
Unfortunately, it isn't powered up all the time so your upload has probably slipped through the net ( I use RECENT to generate a list to test when the box does get powered up ).
I shall try and remember to add your module to my list when I next power up.
Cheers.
Re: (Score:1)
All the modules were in RECENT, processed on alpha-freebsd today:
All PASSes
Mac OS X (Score:2)
0.06_09 still fails on strawberry (Score:1)
After replacing "long" with "int" in the MINGW case (similar to dagolden's patch above), it compiles and tests okay.
Steffen
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Sorry I didn't say this explicitly right away.
Cheers,
Steffen