The editors at O'Reilly asked me for a list of people I think should review the next edition of Learning Perl and it's (separate) study guide.
I gave them a list, but that doesn't mean that those people have time to do it.
Does anyone else want to jump in? I'm not sure what O'Reilly does for tech reviewers, but at least we can put your name in the acknowledges, give you a free Stonehenge shirt, and a free pass to the Stonehenge party at OSCON. Heck, I can even throw in a box full of vintage O'Reilly titles (my choice, slightly used).
Just send a note to me and I'll add you to the list of names I give to the editors. After that it's up to them what happens.
Unless they changed it... (Score:1)
For me the most valuable bit was the last.
Incidentally I wouldn't mind being on the short list again. Though if I am and Randal doesn't remember his promise to stop using $a and $b in example code (unless he's sorting of course), then I'm definitely going to have to do some tsking.
Cheers,
Ben
Re:Unless they changed it... (Score:2)
If you find any... (Score:1)
Thanks,
Ben
I'm interested (Score:1)
Re:I'm interested (Score:1)
Re:I'm interested (Score:1)
If someone actually in the learning process counts (Score:1)
yup (Score:1)
-Scott McWhirter- | -kungfuftr-
"JAWK - Just Another Whiny Kid"
Tuits (Score:2)
Me too (Score:2)
I'm a perl user since 10 years, have been active on comp.lang.perl.misc and the MacPerl mailing list since 1996, and am a Perlmonks user since 2002.
Ditto (Score:1)
------------------------------
You are what you think.
Mee too! (Score:1)