Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

barbie (2653)

barbie
  reversethis-{ku. ... m} {ta} {eibrab}
http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk/

Leader of Birmingham.pm [pm.org] and a CPAN author [cpan.org]. Co-organised YAPC::Europe in 2006 and the 2009 QA Hackathon, responsible for the YAPC Conference Surveys [yapc-surveys.org] and the QA Hackathon [qa-hackathon.org] websites. Also the current caretaker for the CPAN Testers websites and data stores.

If you really want to find out more, buy me a Guinness ;)

Links:
Memoirs of a Roadie [missbarbell.co.uk]
[pm.org]
CPAN Testers Reports [cpantesters.org]
YAPC Conference Surveys [yapc-surveys.org]
QA Hackathon [qa-hackathon.org]

Journal of barbie (2653)

Wednesday December 24, 2003
09:52 AM

Artist 1 : RIAA 0

[ #16489 ]
The BBC news site announced that Springsteen tops concert earners. Interesting that while record companies bemoan the fact that they are losing money, the actual artists who go and do the hard work of touring and performing (Springsteen regularly plays up to 3 hours per gig ... 4 on a good night) are getting respectable rewards.

Pollstar, who compile the figures above, also reported recently that Recording Industry Loses A Big One. It's a loophole, but does mean that many may evade prosecution ... or is that persecution?

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • It's a loophole, but does mean that many may evade prosecution ... or is that persecution?

    The ruling says that RIAA can't require ISPs to identify users without getting a judge to agree that there is reason. So, for now at least, there is less chance of innocent users receiving lawsuit demands; there will be far fewer lawsuit demands in general since the RIAA can't use vague suggestive evidence to lauch a lawsuit and back down if they are shown to be wrong. Of course, after they've gone around the circle

    • Like most loopholes. They are soon closed when business deems it necessary. I'm just waiting for the day someone uses an RIAA officials PC for downloading music ... and gets found out!

      I might even put a disclaimer on my website that allows anyone except employees of RIAA to download the music. Then it's just a matter of watching the IP addresses :) Not that I can do anything about it as I'm not in the US.