Leader of Birmingham.pm [pm.org] and a CPAN author [cpan.org]. Co-organised YAPC::Europe in 2006 and the 2009 QA Hackathon, responsible for the YAPC Conference Surveys [yapc-surveys.org] and the QA Hackathon [qa-hackathon.org] websites. Also the current caretaker for the CPAN Testers websites and data stores.
If you really want to find out more, buy me a Guinness
Links:
Memoirs of a Roadie [missbarbell.co.uk]
[pm.org]
CPAN Testers Reports [cpantesters.org]
YAPC Conference Surveys [yapc-surveys.org]
QA Hackathon [qa-hackathon.org]
I have since removed the image and links, but will not, now nor ever, deny my involvement in a previous version of their site. It seems a bit petty to try and rewrite history, even when the acknowledgement was previously there, that I didn't work on the current version of the site.
However, it is interesting to note that although the website has changed, all my Javascript code is still being used on the current site. I haven't mention this to them, but should they try and get high and mighty they may have a legal case to answer to. Defamation of character perhaps?
The pettiness is only heighten by the fact that my site features quite well on the Google ratings, and with their insistence of removing links, their ratings will reduce. Okay not by much, but I would have thought a little site hiding in the corner of the internet, not proclaiming anything negative about the company, wouldn't have harmed the company. I won't be so favourable to them any more.
Copyright (Score:3, Informative)
Reply to This
Re:Copyright (Score:2)
It's the fact that they wanted me to remove all mention of the fact that tw2 or I were involved in the redesign an
Re:Copyright (Score:2)
Moral rights, section 79, 2a [hmso.gov.uk] states:
So, darn, no you don't have moral rights to be identified as the author. I don't like this law - I think that a computer programme is just as expressive as an artistic work and copyright should protect my rights to be identified.