Is Moose just a fad? Will it go the way of so many cool ideas in programming?
The answer to this question is important, because if it is a fad, I don't reall
| Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re:It's a shame, really... | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Perl.com Administrivia | ||||||
| Re:Community | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Perl 5 Is Dying | ||||||
| Re:Yow! | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Is Object::InsideOut broken? | ||||||
| Re:Don't be pompous | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Note to $self | ||||||
| Re:Data? | ||||||
| Re:Data? | ||||||
| Re:Data? | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Functional vs. OO | ||||||
| Re:Is it broken? | ||||||
| Re:overload | ||||||
| Re:Is it broken? | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Thinking about Accessors | ||||||
| Re:Hard to say... | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Odd inheritance behaviour | ||||||
| Re:Chaining Accessors | ||||||
| Re:chaining | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: First journal entry and accessors | ||||||
| Logged in users can choose whether or not they'd like comments shown grouped by discussion on their comment settings page | ||||||