Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

TeeJay (2309)

TeeJay
  (email not shown publicly)
http://www.aarontrevena.co.uk/

Working in Truro
Graduate with BSc (Hons) in Computer Systems and Networks
pm : london.pm, bath.pm, devoncornwall.pm
lug : Devon & Cornwall LUG
CPAN : TEEJAY [cpan.org]
irc : TeeJay
skype : hashbangperl
livejournal : hashbangperl [livejournal.com]
flickr :hashbangperl [flickr.com]

Journal of TeeJay (2309)

Wednesday June 09, 2004
08:38 AM

UK patents bill

[ #19159 ]
I just read through a fair ammount of the 2nd reading of the Patents Bill in the house of commons.

The only mention of Software patents comes from a Labour MP with concerns about it. He gets the usual misleading nonsense about software not being any more patentable than before and requiring it be 'Novel' -- in anybody elses world this means that software is now patentable and that rather than clarifying they are muddying the waters further and likely to increase patenting of software.

No liberal democrats had enough clue or interest to follow this up, disappointing as the people who care most about this issue are likely to be natural supporters or at least waverers who could maybe vote for them if they just stood up and did something.

Doesn't look like any of the press seem to have noticed all this slipping into our law.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.