Slash Boxes
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Purdy (2383)

AOL IM: EmeraldWarp (Add Buddy, Send Message)
Yahoo! ID: jpurdy2 (Add User, Send Message)

Bleh - not feeling creative right now. You can check me out on PerlMonks [].

Journal of Purdy (2383)

Thursday October 03, 2002
04:01 PM

Latest rise in my blood pressure...

[ #8156 ]
Got my latest issue of eWeek and the cover has two headlines: Open-Source Insecurity? and Microsoft puts meat behind security push ... let's see ... they're talking about the OpenSSL worm that already had a patch out BEFORE the worm was let loose and we've yet to receive a fix for Microsoft's lousy certificate-spoofing bug.

In the article, they put together a cute little table of OS's and the # of patches that have been released (Source: Vendor Web sites). For Red Hat Linux 7.3, they say 35. For Windows XP Pro, they say 6. 6 ?! Are they smoking crack? The SP1 for XP Pro contained several (more than 10, for sure) patches all-included and today, I downloaded two more.

Then ya got this quote from Gene Spafford, professor of CS @ Purdue University:

"Linux is awful. There are no design specs. Everybody and their half-brother who knows some [C code] writes code for it, and they all have the same lack of knowledge. It's who writes it and whether it's planned [that makes a difference], not who looks at the code."

Note to self: Sign Gene up for Microsoft's security alerts... 1000 times. ;)

Well, I guess it shouldn't come as a surprise, as Microsoft has an inside front-cover spread and another 2-page spread in the middle - I'm sure they can flex their advertising spending dollars onto the "objective" editors.


The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.