To illustrate some of my original thinking as well as the company I work for, we're a small publishing company that publishes trade magazines. Right now, our flagship magazine is QSR Magazine (QSR = Quick Service Restaurants [iow: Fast Food]) and we give free subscriptions to US CEO's, Presidents, Managers, and Allied. International folks can pay for a subscription, too, which covers postage. We make our $ from advertisers who want to reach our readers.
So my thinking is that we have 2 sets of customers, our readers and our advertisers. Within our readers, we have a fractured set of folks that subscribe directly, folks that we bought lists on and folks that were subscribed indirectly by a representative of the company they are with. One aspect to CRM is to set a scale of what a customer is worth. A reader that has directly subscribed with us (and on a continued basis) is worth more to us (b/c advertisers see those folks as our true circulation) than a reader who we bought or reaped. So right now, the CRM system I'm thinking about for our business will identify the type of reader they are and help migrate less valuable readers to become more valuable, and retaining our valuable readers.
I guess it's easier for advertisers. Obviously, the advertisers that spend the most over the most amount of time are more valuable than others... haven't thought about this area a lot yet.
Anyway, I hope you find this interesting
Jason
1-to-1/CRM 0 Comments More | Login | Reply /