I noticed on CPAN ratings you mentioned that other XML-RPC modules had problems such as dying on missing elements. Did you have these problems with RPC::XML? If so, could you share them so that I can see about fixing them?
(Though, if the problem is in handling a message that isn't valid XML-RPC, I'm not sure what I should do... are you saying that XML::RPC accepts messages that don't actually conform to the spec?
XML::RPC seems to be a bit more liberal in what it will accept. I think RPC::XML was unable to parse empty elements. I don't recollect exactly, but I was writing code against the OpenX ad server API. I will post an RT bug with the details next time I am in that code.
Versus RPC::XML? (Score:2)
I noticed on CPAN ratings you mentioned that other XML-RPC modules had problems such as dying on missing elements. Did you have these problems with RPC::XML? If so, could you share them so that I can see about fixing them?
(Though, if the problem is in handling a message that isn't valid XML-RPC, I'm not sure what I should do... are you saying that XML::RPC accepts messages that don't actually conform to the spec?
--rjray
Re: (Score:1)