I had so much fun recalling this incident in a reply to Schwern, I thought it deserved a top-level post.
Years ago I worked at a company where we made revenue projections for a particular industry. Industry executives could log on and when they saw what they were trying to project, they had a "weighting" factor that they could enter and the numbers would be adjusted with that. For the sake of argument, we'll say that number defaulted to 12, but based on the executive's knowledge of what they were offering, they would adjust that up or down.
After six months of hard labor, one programmer had revamped the system and the weighting factor defaulted to "15". Our customers were livid. They accused us of "cooking the books". Even though our new numbers were more accurate, somehow the executives thought we were cheating and demanded that we change the default back to 12. Our better revenue projections, ironically, became a PR disaster.
I and another programmer were called into a meeting with a vice president and he asked us to change the number. The other programmer went to the whiteboard and started sketching. He explained how the resources worked, what weights were assigned to them, how revenue was multiplied by those weights and how six months of intensive regression analysis and revamping of our statistical model, blah, blah, blah and circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one.
Fifteen minutes later, the programmer finished. The vice president looked at him and said "Yeah, now can you change the f***ing number to 12?"
Inertia is a terrible thing