Stuff with the Perl Foundation. A couple of patches in the Perl core. A few CPAN modules. That about sums it up.
Testing is not that hard once you get used to it. Testing random things is a bit harder. Testing build systems seems to be the hardest of all. There are so many interdependent things that I was thinking about using state machines to ensure that the build process works correctly. Any state machine modules on the CPAN you recommend? There are some out there, but I've no idea which area really worth the trouble.
In other news, anyone who really knows Oracle is convinced of its power because Oracle really is powerful
Are you hearing me Oracle? You command line client is awful. It sucks very, very hard. Yes, you have all of these neat features that are very useful, but for grunts like me, I want a tool that makes the common tasks easy. Give me autocompletion. Give me a friggin' up arrow. Give me a break.
There are alternatives to SQL*Plus (Score:1)
Are you hearing me Oracle? You command line client is awful. It sucks very, very hard. Yes, you have all of these neat features that are very useful, but for grunts like me, I want a tool that makes the common tasks easy. Give me autocompletion. Give me a friggin' up arrow. Give me a break.
I agree so hard it hurts. That's why I use TOAD [toadsoft.com].
Re:There are alternatives to SQL*Plus (Score:2)
Re:There are alternatives to SQL*Plus (Score:2)
I tried TOra twice. The first time it wouldn't install. The second time it would launch and then throw a bunch of error messages. I was most disappointed by this.
Re:There are alternatives to SQL*Plus (Score:2)
dbish (Score:2)
Seen it, still use sqlplus (Score:1)
Oracle's error messages suck nearly as badly as its command line client, and I see no reason to make them suck any worse than they have to.
Emacs (Score:1)
Re:Emacs (Score:2)
Yes, I do use vi, but that sounds like one heck of a feature!