Stuff with the Perl Foundation. A couple of patches in the Perl core. A few CPAN modules. That about sums it up.
Sometimes it gets very frustrating searching through the metadata of Oracle to find what what I want, particularly since I don't have the shell handy. Getting tired of this, I wrote a simple Perl program, qsql which allows me to execute a lot of queries without using Oracle's pitiful SQLPlus. After fine-tuning it, I realized that most of the things I need to use it for are amenable to further tweaking. I can now do things like:
$ desc ti_releases | grep COUNTRY_ID
ti_releases.COUNTRY_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2(5)
Want a quick description of every table whose name contains the word "product"?
$ for table in `tabs product`; do desc $table; done;
And then I can grep for the fields I am really looking for. It's the full power of bash with most of my most commonly needed database search tools.
URL (Score:1)
life is too short
Re:URL (Score:2)
It still has work a fair amount of work that it needs and it's specific to Oracle, but if you want to see the core of it (fair warning, it's a sloppy hack):
Re:URL (Score:1)
This doesn't need to be Oracle specific if you use the 'table_info' method. In fact, you're calling 'column_info' in a deprecated style (though in past docs, I can only tell that the style was once valid for 'table_info'). Since the 'table_info' and 'column_info' methods allow wildcards for the table name, you could do all the tricky parts with just those methods.
Yeah, there is a bit of slop in that you pass the table name to the desc_tables_and_exit function, but use the captured m
Re:URL (Score:1)
Re:URL (Score:2)
Well, that bit of dreck can easily be explained away by the fact that I was busy doing a refactor I later abandoned and when I posted here I noticed I was using $1 so I tried to fix that on the fly and failed miserably :)
Re:URL (Score:2)
Ack. I hit submit instead of preview. Sigh.
I was trying to thank you for the information, but I didn't get that far :)
What did you dislike about existing shells? (Score:1)
Perhaps another way to state this question is, "What features are you really looking for in a project like this?"
Re:What did you dislike about existing shells? (Score:2)
I didn't know about those others but it looks like they might provide what I was looking for. Basically, I wanted to interact with the database without leaving Bash. By building a few small utilities that interacted with one another, I have the database directly in the shell. If these other projects provide that as seamlessly, I'll probably go with one of them. Thanks for the heads up.