Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Ovid (2709)

Ovid
  (email not shown publicly)
http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/
AOL IM: ovidperl (Add Buddy, Send Message)

Stuff with the Perl Foundation. A couple of patches in the Perl core. A few CPAN modules. That about sums it up.

Journal of Ovid (2709)

Saturday January 03, 2004
04:50 PM

Perl Wishes for 2004

[ #16609 ]

In retrospect, I really don't want autoboxing for Perl. It seemed like a nice hack, but until I know what problem it solves, I don't see a need for it. The top five things I would like for Perl, however, are:

  1. A reentrant regular expression engine. I think could actually implement a proper predicate logic system were it not for this limitation.
  2. A clean OO model.
  3. "Defined or" ($foo // $bar; $baz //= 3) become part of the core.
  4. Method signatures (with method overloading).
  5. A built-in GUI system (preferably wxPerl).

Santa got me clothes, books, and sushi cookware instead.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • 3. "Defined or" ($foo // $bar; $baz //= 3) become part of the core.
    "Defined or" is already in 5.9.x.
    --

    --
    "Cake or Death!" .... "Cake please"
    • That makes me happy. I heard it was going to make it into 5.10, so this is nice confirmation. It was also, I hasten to add, the only item on the list that I thought would actually happen.

  • 1. Reetrant regexes : this isn't trivial and needs some effort to understand how the engine works overall. Volunteers welcome.

    2. Are you implicitly saying that the OO model of perl isn't clean ?? ;)

    3. Done :)

    4. Scott Walters suggested recently that making stashes tieable makes it possible to implement method overloading on method signature (for a particular class).

    5. Ain't gonna happen. Patches not welcome, for once.

    • I shan't volunteer for the re-entrant regex fix as my C-fu is weak and when we tell scary stories around the campfire, someone always brings up someone's journey into the regex engine's depths. I'd rather perform a colonoscopy on a flatulent pachyderm.

      It's a shame, though. without reentrant regexes, the utility of (??{}) is severely limited. If it were fixed, we could open up an entirely new class of programming.

      And I would never say that Perl's OO model isn't clean. Why, I just think it's oodles of