Stuff with the Perl Foundation. A couple of patches in the Perl core. A few CPAN modules. That about sums it up.
It's rather curious, but as of this writing, much of the news reports from Google regarding WMD evidence falls either in one of two camps: either the Bush administration defending their evidence and everyone else questioning it. The sole exception seemed to be a Fox News article which suggested that the evidence was forthcoming. Had that article not been from a purveyor of blatantly jingoistic reporting, it may have carried more weight.
Given that this has been a slow buildup to this point, I can't help but wonder if this is really "news", or if the news sources are simply jumping on the latest media bandwagon.
One interesting quote from Hans Blix:
"They did not have patience for that (prolonged U.N. inspections)," Blix said in a telephone interview broadcast Friday on Colombian radio.
"However, of course what I notice now is that when the American inspectors do not find anything, then it is suggested we should have patience."
I had a feeling that it would be so ... (Score:1)
neophyte Niederrhein.pm [pm.org]
Re:I had a feeling that it would be so ... (Score:2)
I don't know if there are weapons in Iraq, or were, and I only care for reasons OTHER than whether war was actu
Re:I had a feeling that it would be so ... (Score:2)
For the record, I absolutely do not buy your argument, but at least it's a darned sight more intellectually honest than most pro-war arguments that I hear.
Re:I had a feeling that it would be so ... (Score:2)
Resolution 687 (from 1991, the cease-fire agreement) said that it was Iraq's responsibility to prove that it had no weapons. It can only do that by fully cooperating, because any lack of cooperating means they could be hiding s