Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Matts (1087)

Matts
  (email not shown publicly)

I work for MessageLabs [messagelabs.com] in Toronto, ON, Canada. I write spam filters, MTA software, high performance network software, string matching algorithms, and other cool stuff mostly in Perl and C.

Journal of Matts (1087)

Thursday August 05, 2004
06:27 PM

The web broke "innovation"

[ #20259 ]

Innovation is a strange word. It was abused by microsoft to mean "it's OK to abuse monopoly power" a couple of years ago, and it is probably never used correctly, so please excuse me here, and substitute a better word if you can, if you find I use it offensively.

I believe the web has broken innovation.

Ten years ago software was the last frontier. It was a system that allowed the lone inventor to capture his ideas in a framework, hone it over time, and present it to the masses in a production-ready form.

The internet broke that.

You cannot, in todays world, innovate to any significant extent. Every minor idea you have had. Every spark of genius you can possibly invent. It has already been blogged or discussed online somewhere.

The reason: blogging something is far easier than coding something up. So people just blog it.

On the last day of OSCon I attended a talk by Brewster Kahle of the "Wayback Machine" fame. He spoke about how he believed one of the next "big" internet projects could be a video browser, that allowed you to create the equivalent of HTML for video (similar to SMIL, but easier to cross-link), and that the person who creates such a browser will be the next Marc Andreeson.

He's wrong.

Because now there are 5 developers working on that project. Or 5 projects and 20 developers. And none will create a monopoly like Netscape, because the internet has beaten monopoly.

And all of this is good. And probably controversial :-)

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • That's true -- but I firmly believe that monopolies may be reestablished through large companies lobbying governments to establish pro-monopolistic laws. (cf: copyright control, software patents.) So there's the danger to look out for over the next few years...
  • It's also the nature of software development. If someone comes out with a Cool Thing , then other companies/programmers can reproduce it on their own and incorporate it into their product.

    That's why patents remain popular with software. They serve as a deterrent and protection against other companies/people taking your idea and stealing your market from you. I don't really want to start a flamewar on patents (there are plenty of examples of abuse) ... I'm just saying that if they were properly use