During the last year I took over the lead in the top posters of RT tickets both for the year and for all time. I'd like to take the opportunity to apologize to all recipients for my being such a pain in the neck but also to thank the hundreds of you who fixed their code quite often on the same day I posted my report.
RT has proven to be an excellent tool to work with, it is reliable and fast and easy to use. Thanks to the nevertired Ruslan and the whole team at bestpractical for providing the excellent service.
Thanks also to the cpantesters for laying the ground work of testing in many endless loops.
So let's first look at the boring all-time-posters highscore:
1: ANDK 1104 2: SREZIC 811 3: MSCHWERN 607 4: guest 486 5: ADAMK 397 6: MARKSTOS 389 7: CHORNY 354 8: FWIE 231 9: RRWO 206 10: TONYC 166 11: JDHEDDEN 165 12: WMCKEE 164 13: IMACAT 158 14: JKEGL 151 15: SMPETERS 148 16: MTHURN 146 17: LGODDARD 142 18: DAGOLDEN 140 19: RJBS 132 20: CDOLAN 125 21: JPIERCE 121 22: MAREKR 120 23: RCAPUTO 120 24: FREQUENCY 116 25: JESSE 107 26: ATOURBIN 98 27: SAPER 93 28: KMX 92 29: RSAVAGE 91 30: DMUEY 91 31: PETDANCE 88 32: BARBIE 86 33: DANDV 85 34: KANE 85 35: JJORE 82 36: David Favor 82 37: DOLMEN 81 38: NKH 80 39: Niko Tyni 80 40: BOBTFISH 79This year I want to accompany the list with a top-40-posters-per-year listing to give the newcomers a chance to recognize themselves in relation to others:
1: ANDK 461 2: FWIE 212 3: SREZIC 130 4: MSCHWERN 116 5: FREQUENCY 108 6: JKEGL 96 7: KMX 92 8: DOLMEN 77 9: DANDV 71 10: MARKSTOS 53 11: noreply 51 12: CHORNY 50 13: ADAMK 47 14: DAXIM 46 15: BOBTFISH 45 16: DAGOLDEN 43 17: REHSACK 41 18: JJORE 40 19: DMUEY 39 20: JQUELIN 39 21: RSRCHBOY 39 22: OTTO 35 23: ECARROLL 34 24: TODDR 32 25: CSJEWELL 32 26: David Favor 32 27: Salvatore Bonaccorso 31 28: JPIERCE 30 29: TNISHINO 29 30: Andrew Feren 27 31: JDHEDDEN 26 32: KANE 25 33: ZEFRAM 25 34: MSTEVENS 24 35: MTHURN 24 36: TBONE 23 37: SADRAK 23 38: JESSE 22 39: John Malmberg 20 40: TIMB 20Thanks to all of you for being critical consumers who play their part in improving the quality of CPAN and helping the busy authors spotting the problem areas in their code.
It seems I haven't yet answered the question in the headline, did I? Let me admit, it's a trade off I made between quality and quantity. A high percentage of my bug reports were Undeclared dependency issues. And the way I found the issues culminated in the new http://analysis.cpantesters.org/ site that started its existence yesterday. I'll post about this new site later. But for now I'd like to invite you all to visit it and put the tools provided there to productive use. Beat me in the effort getting the analytic findings out to the CPAN authors and help me go back to my own broken code that urgently needs fixing.
Happy New Year
thanks! (Score:1)
You definitely haven't been a pain in the neck, you've provided consistently useful reports that almost always allowed me to quickly make releases that greatly improved the chances of my software to "just work." So, thanks very much!
rjbs
Write them for your own modules. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Hehe, you're right, your tickets would drop to 35 or less and your rank would be beyond 100. Unfortunately it's quite a bit more tricky to provide stats that eliminate tickets to self because many tickets reach Status=resolved without ever getting an Owner. So I'll refrain posting revised stats.