Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Beatnik (493)

Beatnik
  (email not shown publicly)
http://www.ldl48.org/

A 29 year old belgian who likes Mountain Dew, Girl Scout Cookies, Tim Hortons French Vanilla Flavoured Cappucinno, Belgian beer, Belgian chocolate, Belgian women, Magners Cider, chocolate chipped cookies and Perl. Likes snowboarding, snorkling, sailing and silence. Bach can really cheer him up! He still misses his dog.

Project Daddy of Spine [sf.net], a mod_perl based CMS.

In his superhero time (8.30 AM to 5.30 PM), he works on world peace.

Journal of Beatnik (493)

Sunday May 22, 2005
09:25 AM

King Arthur

[ #24819 ]
The over-hyped King Arthur was quite disappointing. Am I allowed to drool on Keira Knightley in that freaky costume?
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • I wonder how the people at the site you linked can be certain the photo was maniuplated from that specific original -- studio shoots consist of 100's of originals, they might have gotten her to stand up straighter, suck it in, and put on the woad between shots.
    --
    Bill
    # I had a sig when sigs were cool
    use Sig;
    • Probably because it looks 99,99% the same, except for the boob job and the small stuff? :)
    • By superimposing the result over the source, in Photoshop.
      They line up perfectly, when the quoted rotations are made. If she'd changed position, the relative positions of her hips, shoulders and chin (amongst others) would have changed slightly, but they're exactly the same. The straps etc. hang in exactly the same way, except those moved by post-processing, in a reproducible manner, and the shadows are the same.
      That analysis of the image was generated by copying the transformations - there really isn't
      • ok, thanks. I guess I should have figured that the precise angles were based on a reconstruction, but that wasn't obvious on first reading.
        --
        Bill
        # I had a sig when sigs were cool
        use Sig;