I've just released Time::Tiny to the CPAN. It should appear on your mirror shortly.
This is the second in a series of three date/time Tiny modules.
In the Time::Tiny case, it is intended for parsing and generating ISO 8601 compatible time objects, but without the ability to do any significant manipulation to them.
To make up for this, as for Date::Tiny, if you have DateTime installed, you can use the DateTime method on a Time::Tiny object to get the equivalent DateTime object.
This leaves only DateTime::Tiny, the third in the series, to be written.
But this one might take a little while to happen because, like a good CPAN citizen, I'm going to be consulting with the DateTime people first, since I'd be stomping on their namespace.
I've also done another round in the neverending task of upgrading old modules to meet newer, better, ways of doing things.
This time around I've upgraded Module::Install, and done some test scripts cleaning, on about a dozen modules. I've also pulled another half dozen modules from the old CVS repository to the new SVN one.
As a side effect, my Kwalitee should receive a nice boost, to make up for the sheer boringness of module tidy ups.
Why? (Score:2)
The docs make the excuse that loading time modules takes 3-4MB (only true for DateTime - try something lighter like Date::Class or Time::Piece), but for *::Tiny to do anything useful it looks like you'd have to do that anyway.
I (for obvious reasons) totally disagree with the flamebait in your docs about how DateTime.pm is the
Re: (Score:1)
What I found was that quite a significant amount of work was having to be done just to create the DateTime objects, far more than I was comfortable with.
And yet the data did not require that level of rigour, I wasn't going to be doing anything with the dates, just holding them in memory, possibly converting to a
Re: (Score:1)
*hint*
Re: (Score:2)
I guess I'm lucky enough to have never really needed that much comprehensiveness. 4MB just to load one damn perl module (never mind the hassle of installing the thing) is just asking too much.
Re: (Score:1)
The only problem was on Windows, and the DateTime guys have fixed that now.
But yes, it is expensive. Which is why the Tiny modules exist.
And while I have your attention, any chance of getting some small releases of the modules you have commit on (that I mentioned a few posts ago).
The bugs are tiny things, but it would help us out a LOT to have some of your high profile modules working on Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The specific bugs causing the problem are on win32.perl.org
http://win32.perl.org/wiki/index.php?title=Problem_Modules [perl.org]
Re: (Score:2)
I'll try and get around to DBD::SQLite later today.
Re: (Score:1)
Just double checked and not working here either.
I'm CC'ing you on the particular failure.
But it's not tiny! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Date::Manip - 4500k
DateTime - 2500k
Time::Tiny - 140k
So while Date::Manip might have a slightly smaller object size, it's a monster to get into memory in the first place. Time::Tiny has a 4+ meg headstart.
All of the
Config::Tiny vs Config::Simple and Config::General
CSS::Tiny vs CSS
And so on...