Slash Boxes
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

use Perl Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Alias (5735)

  (email not shown publicly)

Journal of Alias (5735)

Tuesday August 29, 2006
12:30 PM

Strawberry alpha 2 is looking great, so where to next?

[ #30792 ]

I've been running the new Strawberry Perl alpha 2 for 24 hours now.

I have to say it feels terribly "done", and most of the credit goes to David Golden for working on it so consistently to get it to this point.

CPAN::Reporter feels a little clunky to get set up still, but it works properly and I'm already sending off streams of reports as I reinstall my normal modules. And with the optional author CC feature, this time around I can automate the emails to bug authors to fix their one last tiny bug so we can get them green on Win32.

The #win32 team continues to test and track various high-use CPAN modules. And if you happen to have co-maint on one of the major modules we are tracking, we'd really appreciate it if you could take a look at the Vanilla Problem Modules page and see if you can resolve the problem. Most of the bugs are tiny and easily fixed, if you can find a tuit.

    The Win32 CPAN Most Wanted Modules
    (broken, blocking stuff, looks trivial to fix)

    1. DBD::SQLite - Blocking JSAN/Maypole/Siesta
    2. Template - Blocking Catalyst
    3. IPC::Run - Blocking CPANPLUS
    4. Time::Piece - Blocking Email::*
    5. File::chdir - Blocking SVK
    6. Test::WWW::Mechanize - Blocking SVN::Web/Rubric


The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Just out of curiosity, did you ever consider bundling some version of MS VC++? I mean, it's free now, right? Licensing issues? Perhaps a conversation with MS is in order.
    • Just out of curiosity, did you ever consider bundling some version of MS VC++?

      You're kidding, right? MS changes his mind faster than open source can track and may be really inconvenient to make arrangements with. It is annoying as Oracle - have you tried the hassle of installing DBD::Oracle via ppm with ActiveState Perl? Read the license, agree, download 18M, something went bad, do it all again, and have fun. I think that's their lemma.

      • No, I'm not kidding. I've got it on good authority that MinGW does not work on 64 bit Windows, and it doesn't look like it will anytime soon. What happens to those users?
        • I'd like to see more evidence of this before changing anything, like reports some people that have actually tried it, or mailing list entries, or something more concrete than hearsay.

          FWIW, I've got Vista installed here on my flatmate's laptop, and everything seems to work just fine. I can't say if it's running in 32 or 64 bit mode though.

          Do you have any details on the "doesn't work and won't any time soon"?

          The big problem with the Microsoft stuff is that it isn't open source, we have very little control ove
          • Ignore "Also, I just found the following on a website that tracks Win32 C compilers."

            I had found a comment on Visual C Express, and realised it was wrong, since you can get just the compiler.
          • I'm not arguing with regards to size and convenience - I understand you concerns.

            Regarding the 64 bit issue, I'm taking the word of Austin Ziegler, who has had to deal with these issues for Ruby and Windows. He's gone down the MinGW road and gave up. Now that I've re-read his post, though, he does admit that he hasn't tried for a while.

            However, it's certainly worth checking out. If it does turn out to support 64 bit platforms (or not), that would prove to be useful information either way.

            http://gro []

            • I've done a bit of research on this problem, and from what I can see it's not impossible, merely a case of tuits, and it not being enough of a priority for enough people yet.

              Looking at all the comments, I think there just isn't enough pressure yet. And part of that is my "WinXP 64 bit is shite" feeling.

              So my suspicion is that as soon as Vista comes out, the pressure for 64 bit support will become huge, and by the looks there are so many large projects using MinGW now, that there will be enough people lookin